CONCLUSION: Many leading endocrinology journals have addressed AI use; however, their policies remain incomprehensive. It is critical that publishers and their journals establish explicit guidelines regarding the use of AI tools to promote transparent, reproducible, and reliable research.

CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we demonstrated that mentored chart review can improve resident confidence in practice accreditation. Resident confidence appeared to peak after four cycles of chart review. Structured mentorship programs such as the Practice Accreditation Resident Reviewer Program (PARRP) may help supplement radiation oncology education in patient safety and quality improvement.

The rise of methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the U.S. highlights a need for appropriate and effective management strategies. The complexities of Methamphetamine-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension are magnified by socioeconomic and health disparities associated with substance use disorders. This study asked: what are the experiences, barriers, and unmet needs of patients living with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension? Structured...

CONCLUSION: The lack of effective recruitment and retention strategies in thyroid cancer trials perpetuates the underrepresentation of marginalized populations, limiting the generalizability of findings. To address these disparities, clinical trials must adopt inclusive methodologies and transparent reporting practices, supported by policy changes and stronger enforcement of diversity mandates. These steps are essential for ensuring equitable health outcomes and advancing the quality of thyroid...

CONCLUSIONS: Outcome modifications are frequent in sinonasal trials but are rarely transparently documented. Given the central role of symptom-based, quality-of-life, and endoscopic outcomes in rhinology, clearer documentation of outcome changes is essential to support interpretability and evidence synthesis.